You can’t have an emotional romance without conflict, right? Conflict is one of my biggest challenges. I generally don’t like a lot of plot in my romances. (That’s why I don’t like intrigues.) I do love conflict. I love the story to be essentially about how they meet, how they get together, and the emotional bumps as they fall more and more in love with each other. But I only like a certain type of conflict. I don’t like conflict that comes about from ridiculous misunderstandings that can easily be dealt with through healthy communication. I don’t like conflict stemming from immaturity. I do love conflict that comes about from blackmail situations, but these days with (happily) women’s empowerment, women can quite easily walk away from most scenarios that cause the type of conflict I love to read. A relative putting the heroine in a difficult situation? Unhealthy and poor boundaries. The hero being a jerk with an inner core of vulnerability? That’s one of my favorites, but the more I understand psychology, the harder it is to pull that off realistically. Are men like that really able to change and communicate and be vulnerable to the women they love? I have a similar problem with scarring childhoods. The happily ever after is a tough sell.
An emotionally stirring romance is about the internal journey of both characters as they master inner conflict. The book What I Did for a Duke by Julie Anne Long did an excellent job of building a relationship that made both characters into better human beings and expanded their worldviews.
I have a really hard time creating conflict that highlights the exciting dynamic between male and female and yet is still emotionally believable and has the behavior patterns of emotionally healthy communication and admirable choices, which is what I want from my heroes and heroines.